Billy Harris vs Manas Manoj Dhamne Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Harris vs M. Manoj Dhamne

Billy Harris
GBR
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
17
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
124
C. Rank
601
101
Best Rank
598
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$331.7K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Manas Manoj Dhamne
IND
w
w
l
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
17
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
-
124
C. Rank
601
101
Best Rank
598
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$331.7K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Harris 1 - 0 Dhamne
They have played 2 sets in total, with Billy Harris winning 2 and Manas Manoj Dhamne winning 0. The last match between Billy Harris and Manas Manoj Dhamne was at the Pune Challenger, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Billy Harris getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Harris | 1 |
| Dhamne | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Pune Challenger(02-18-25)
Billy Harris
6
6
Manas Manoj Dhamne
4
4
B. Harris vs M. M. Dhamne H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $331,680 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.03% (431-287) | Career Total W/L | 60.13% (92-61) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 18.75% (3-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Harris vs M. M. Dhamne Match Preview:
Recent Form Performance of Second Serve: In their most recent form over the past six months, the remarkable Harris has successfully emerged victorious in 49.09% of points played on their second serve. Conversely, the formidable Dhamne has secured triumphs in 47.24% of similar instances. It is worth noting the significant correlation between this statistic and the accuracy of predicting the outcome of a match.
Return Game Statistics in Recent Form: Looking into the return game statistics, we find that Harris, in their recent form, has astoundingly conquered 50.18% of their opponent's second serve points. On the other hand, the exceptional Dhamne has attained an even more impressive 51.9% success rate in this area. Furthermore, when it comes to first serve returns, Harris has achieved a commendable 27.79% while Dhamne has remarkably soared to 41.53%. This crucial data highly influences the identification of the favored player in this captivating head-to-head matchup.
Analysis of Performance Under Pressure: When it comes to saving breakpoints in critical moments, the resilient Harris has effectively saved 60.54% of such situations in their recent outings. In comparison, the determined Dhamne has displayed remarkable resilience by saving 53.98% of breakpoints. This insightful statistic proves to be highly beneficial as it aids in making accurate predictions for in-game betting.
Performance Overview: Observing the overall performance over the past year, Harris has exhibited admirable prowess by winning 53.09% of the matches played, with a win/loss record of 43/38. In stark contrast, Dhamne has enjoyed an exceptional triumph rate of 66.67% (win/loss record: 46/23). Such data provides us with a comprehensive overview to predict the outcome of their enthralling head-to-head clashes.
Identification of the Best Playing Surface: Harris brilliantly showcases their talent on the grass surface, securing victory in an astounding 64% of matches (win/loss record: 29/16). Conversely, their performance on indoor hard courts leaves a bit to be desired, with a somewhat lower success rate of 56% (win/loss record: 47/37). Dhamne, on the other hand, unveils their brilliance on hard courts, achieving an impressive 64% win rate (win/loss record: 41/23). However, their performance on clay courts is comparatively weaker, with a 56% win rate (win/loss record: 24/19).
Player Level Assessment: In the past year, Harris has predominantly encountered challenging opponents in Challenger/ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. During this period, they have impressively secured victory in 55.81% of matches (win/loss record: 24/19). Conversely, Dhamne has primarily participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a prize money value of $10,000. Demonstrating exceptional skill and determination, they have triumphed in a staggering 67.16% of matches (win/loss record: 45/22). It is imperative to consider the differential levels of events they have participated in when comparing the statistics to predict the favorite.
Opponent Quality Statistics: Over the course of the last 12 months, Harris has faced opponents with an average ranking of 192.01. In contrast, Dhamne has confronted players with an average rank of 366.19. This insightful data sheds light on the caliber of competition each player has encountered and provides valuable information for accurate predictions.
Decisive Set Performance against All Players: For enthusiasts seeking live predictions and skilled betting, it is crucial to note that if this match enters a deciding set, Harris has emerged triumphant in an impressive 61% of deciding sets over the past year. Remarkably, Dhamne has showcased their extraordinary prowess by clinching victory in a remarkable 68% of all matches played on the tour. This data proves to be invaluable when analyzing and forecasting the outcome of closely contested matches.
Current Head-to-Head Statistics: While the past performance of players is undeniably useful in predicting tennis matches, it is equally important to examine current event stats to gauge the form of players in question. Kindly refer to the section below for detailed insights regarding their performance in the ongoing event. Additionally, it is vital to consider certain players' tendencies to excel in specific events, as this factor greatly influences the overall outcome.
Break Point Conversion Efficiency: In their recent encounters, the remarkable Harris has astutely converted 38.74% of their breakpoint opportunities, while the formidable Dhamne has showcased an impressive conversion rate of 50.82% when presented with chances to break their opponents' serves. This enlightening statistic proves instrumental in providing live betting tips and insights when either player finds themselves on the cusp of a breakpoint opportunity.
Should you possess an interest in models offering predictions for tennis matches, we highly recommend reading this informative article. However, please note that it caters primarily to the inquisitive minds of statistics enthusiasts.
Billy Harris vs Manas Manoj Dhamne Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Harris vs M. M. Dhamne H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:42:42 | Average Match Time | 1:42:42 |
| 72% (53/74) | 1st Serve % | 68% (51/75) |
| 64% (34/53) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (28/51) |
| 52% (11/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (13/24) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 45% (34/75) | Return Points Win % | 39% (29/74) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Harris 50%, Dhamne 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Harris 50%, Dhamne 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Harris 62%, Dhamne 58%.
B. Harris Recent Matches Played
M. M. Dhamne Recent Matches Played

B. Harris vs M. M. Dhamne Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.03% (431/287) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.13% (92/61) |
| 57.58% (968/713) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.94% (197/143) |
| 53.01% (8540/7571) | Games Win/Loss | 54.26% (1687/1422) |
| 62.26% (193/117) | Hard Win/Loss | 64.04% (57/32) |
| 59.46% (154/105) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.69% (35/29) |
| 53.76% (50/43) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.71% (34/22) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2752 | Aces Total | 89 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1924 | Total Double Faults | 233 |
| 1:26:34 | Average Match Time | 1:15:7 |
| 409.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.8 |
| 61% (25409/41596) | 1st Serve % | 67% (4630/6866) |
| 70% (17850/25409) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (2810/4630) |
| 49% (7953/16186) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1101/2236) |
| 43% (1698/3940) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (346/785) |
| 39% (16418/41709) | Return Points Win % | 43% (2994/6979) |
| 52.17% (12/11) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.84% (21/22) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 56.41% (110/85) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 63.95% (282/159) | Futures W/L | 63.50% (87/50) |
| 60% (427/709) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (91/150) |
| 20% (1/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (116/235) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (16/32) |
| 56% (136/243) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (24/37) |
| 86% (414/358) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 94% (84/79) |
| 14% (414/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 6% (84/5) |
| 24% (304/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (69/14) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
02:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.069
W2
6.55
06:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
2.4
W2
1.49
06:00 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.2
W2
1.29
09:30 AM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
3.94
W2
1.2
07:00 PM 13/11/25
PredictionW1
1.23
W2
3.64
05:00 AM 14/11/25
PredictionW1
2.2
W2
1.58
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
12 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Marco Cecchinato vs Mariano Navone Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Gustavo Heide vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Ben Shelton vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
12 Nov 2025
Laslo Djere vs Tom Paris Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 12th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:00
H2H 5-5
13:30
H2H 6-3
12:00
H2H 7-1
13:30
H2H 6-1
19:00
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Manama
Bahrain
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia